SeanRowe83 wrote:
1.) Like I said, it's a love hate relationship. I mostly love it, but I often hate it, although not the game so much as the problems, ie lag, spawning, and the fact that I feel forced to upgrade every year.
You are not forced to do anything, second nothing in the game is meant to be perfect nor will you encounter something that doesn't have "problems" ever. You cannot expect to buy something and it not have an issue you wont like, this is life thing.
SeanRowe83 wrote:
2.) There is nothing fun or "plus" about playing someone far away and lagging so bad you cant hit them, and are being killed by them before you even see them. Maybe you enjoy meeting people far away but you only represent a very small minority. The rest of us want a good game. No one ever talks to each other, except to talk smack. Since I've been playing Ive maybe heard 2 good conversations.
I did not respond to you with the intent to prove whats fun to you or me, I am saying its always been cool to play vs people from areas not of your own. If you can statistically prove that I am a minority, feel fee to.
SeanRowe83 wrote:
3.)Think about the name of the game..."Modern Warfare" with real weapons, movements, scenarios, everything except for IED's, grenades, and 2 perks. You can't disagree that their intent was to be realistic. Yet they have failed with the IED and the grenade, and the perks "oracle" and "ping" just do not fit. So the game is 96% realistic is my point, why would they add this other crap?
No, they are not meant to behave any anyway "real" just because the name is. Its a arcade shooter, not a sim. Sorry, it is what is is. And where did you get 96% from?
SeanRowe83 wrote:
4.) I cant believe you are defending their spawn system. It is just plain stupid and ridiculous and unfair to spawn an enemy directly behind you, or spawn you directly in front of an enemy. This can easily be fixed. And it should. And I know the majority will agree with me.
Far from defending, rationalizing it. If it can be easily fixed, how come it hasnt? I agree, with you the spawns are / have been bad.
SeanRowe83 wrote:
5.) I guess your edu isn't that high because you would realize a "want" of something unnecessary, is not a demand. I guess you have not played World of Warcraft because they offer WAY more customization options at NO extra charge. But not this game...noooooo....they release map pack after map pack, gun after gun, etc, etc. slowly, every couple months, in a sly way to milk you of your money. And this also splits up the community between those who can afford the new maps, and those who cant. This is not a business model I approve of, and neither should you. Especially since they are making so much dang money already and not fixing current problems. And throwing out a game every year has nothing to do with supply and demand. They are "CREATING" a 'WANT" to maximize profits by offering small improvements, different maps, a new move (the slide), etc. It's all about the money. It's pure simple greed. Look at how little players are online on average. I hate that they are splitting up the gaming community like this. There's probably what, over 4 million into these series, but all split up, year after year to only the people that can afford to upgrade.
Hold on cowboy, no one is insulting you, your edu or your post, so cool down.
I responded with what it is: Activision is a Corporation and they will make money, your choice to buy it, your choice not to simple economics.
If you are expecting some sort of "social free gaming" platform, well then that would be very interesting to see who can maintain it.
SeanRowe83 wrote:
6.) And all the noobs can bring their backlash. The only people that will be offended are the campers. NO one likes them anyway
Ok.
Guy, I responded to your post with no intent to insult you, so try not get all your bloomers in one either.